Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Clinical Care Using Electronic Administration and Telehealth Technologies: Realist Synthesis of Potential Mechanisms for Improving Health Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The routine measurement of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical care using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) is gaining momentum worldwide. However, a deep understanding of the mechanisms underpinning ePROM interventions that could inform their optimal design to improve health outcomes is needed. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the implicit mechanisms that underpin the effectiveness of ePROM interventions and develop program theories about how and when ePROM interventions improve health outcomes. METHODS: A realist synthesis of the literature about ePROM interventions in cancer clinical care was performed. A conceptual framework of ePROM interventions was constructed to define the scope of the review and frame the initial program theories. Literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, supplemented by citation tracking, were performed to identify relevant literature to develop, refine, and test program theories. Quality appraisal of relevant studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Overall, 61 studies were included in the realist synthesis: 15 (25%) mixed methods studies, 9 (15%) qualitative studies, 13 (21%) descriptive studies, 21 (34%) randomized controlled trials, and 3 (5%) quasi-experimental studies. In total, 3 initial program theories were developed regarding the salient components of ePROM interventions-remote self-reporting, real-time feedback to clinicians, and clinician-patient telecommunication. The refined theories posit that remote self-reporting enables patients to recognize and report symptoms accurately and empowers them to communicate these to clinicians, real-time feedback prompts clinicians to manage symptoms proactively, and clinician-patient telephone interactions and e-interactions between clinic encounters improve symptom management by reshaping how clinicians and patients communicate. However, the intervention may not achieve the intended benefit if ePROMs become a reminder to patients of their illness and are not meaningful to them and when real-time feedback to clinicians lacks relevance and increases the workload. CONCLUSIONS: The key to improving health outcomes through ePROM interventions is enabling better symptom reporting and communication through remote symptom self-reporting, promoting proactive management of symptoms through real-time clinician feedback, and facilitating clinician-patient interactions. Patient engagement with self-reporting and clinician engagement in responding to feedback are vital and may reinforce each other in improving outcomes. Effective ePROM interventions might fundamentally alter how clinicians and patients interact between clinic encounters.

Cochlear sparing in LINAC-based radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc, IMRT and VMAT treatment plans.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the preferred treatment for vestibular schwannoma (VS) in patients with preserved hearing and tumour diameter < 3 cm. Emerging evidence suggests restricting cochlear dose could preserve hearing. This retrospective replanning study aims to compare dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for superiority of cochlear dose sparing without compromising tumour coverage. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included sporadic VS, serviceable hearing and availability of CT and MRI for planning. The original gross tumour volume and brainstem OAR volume were retained; the cochlea was newly contoured on the planning CT scan (bone window). Each case was replanned using the three above techniques, prescribing 12 Gy to the 80% isodose line. No dose constraint was applied to the cochlea. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were replanned. Mean tumour volume was 2.25 cc. Tumour coverage and tumour mean dose (DCAT: 14.2, IMRT: 14.6, VMAT: 14.5 Gy) were comparable. Paddick and RTOG conformity indices were better for DCAT (0.66 and 1.6) and VMAT (0.69 and 1.5) compared to IMRT (0.56 and 1.9). DCAT had superior gradient index (3.0) compared to VMAT (3.4) and IMRT (3.4). VMAT delivered the lowest mean brainstem maximum dose (8.3 Gy) and decreased the mean cochlear dose (3.4 Gy) by 2.3 and 2.1 Gy, and the mean cochlear maximum dose (3.6 Gy) by 2.4 and 2.5 Gy relative to DCAT and IMRT, respectively. CONCLUSION: LINAC-based SRS treatment using VMAT can achieve better cochlear dose sparing than DCAT or IMRT while maintaining tumour coverage.

The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: Despite excellent tumor control after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS), the hearing preservation rate remains unsatisfactorily low. Although many factors have been associated with hearing loss, the dose to cochlea has gained more interest in recent years. However, studies investigating the relation between cochlear dose and hearing outcomes have produced inconsistent results. The purpose of this work is to systematically review the literature and critically analyze the studies that investigated the correlation between cochlear dose and hearing loss. Methods and Materials: A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed. Studies were included if the SRS dose used was 11 to 14 Gy and included adult patients with sporadic VS, initially serviceable hearing, and at least 24 months of mean or median follow-up. Results: Twenty-one cohort studies and 1 case-control study were eligible for inclusion, and none were considered to be truly prospective. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies in terms of baseline hearing status, cochlear dosimetry, definition and reporting of hearing outcome, and duration of follow-up, limiting comparison between studies and precluding formal meta-analysis. Eleven studies showed a statistically significant correlation between cochlear dose and hearing outcome, but there was considerable variation in the reported cochlear dose parameter that predicted hearing outcome and whether it was an independent predictor. The definition of hearing outcome and whether the outcome variable is continuous or dichotomous have a bearing on the reported correlation between cochlear dose and hearing outcome. Conclusions: Whether cochlear dose is a predictor of hearing preservation after SRS for VS could not be unequivocally determined. Future studies should use consistent cochlear dosimetry and hearing outcomes for reliable assessment. In the meantime, based on currently available data, a practical approach will be to aim for a mean cochlear dose <4 to 6 Gy without compromising tumor dose.

LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: An updated single centre analysis of outcomes.

Arteriovenous malformations (AVM) of the brain are congenital, high pressure vascular malformations, which are at risk of haemorrhage. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can obliterate the nidus by delivering a precise high dose of ionising radiation in a single fraction. This paper updates long term AVM obliteration rates, time to obliteration and retreatment outcomes in LINAC delivered SRS treatment at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained AVM SRS database supplemented by clinical case notes, patient correspondence and electronic medical records was performed. 89 AVMs received primary SRS treatment for which the crude obliteration rate was 61% (68% for 79 patients with adequate follow up). Higher marginal dose, smaller nidus size and lower Pollock-Flickinger (PF) score were significantly associated with AVM obliteration. The crude obliteration rates for patients with adequate follow-up and AVM diameter < 3 cm vs ≥ 3 cm were 76% vs 48%, respectively, and 93% with PF score < 1.0. Median time to obliteration was 36 months. Higher dose and lower PF score were associated with earlier obliteration. The crude obliteration rate after second SRS was 56% (9/16 patients) and no significant associations were found. These obliteration rates after primary and retreatment LINAC SRS are comparable to other studies. Marginal dose and PF score were the main predictors of obliteration overall as well as early (<36 months) obliteration.

Rapid Access Palliative Radiation Therapy Clinics: The Evidence Is There, but Where Are the Clinics? An Australian and New Zealand Perspective.

PURPOSE: First developed in Canada in the 1990s, Rapid Access Palliative Radiation Therapy (RAPRT) clinics have subsequently spread internationally to expedite treatment for near end-of-life patients, sparing them the need for multiple visits to the department. A "classical" RAPRT clinic is herein defined as "a dedicated clinic specifically established to enable (ideally) same day consultation, planning for, and delivery of palliative radiation treatment." The aim of this work was to determine the current status of these clinics in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A phone survey of all 100 Australian and 10 NZ radiation therapy centers was conducted in March and April 2021. The Chief Medical Officers of the 2 large private practices (GenesisCare and Icon) also approved the survey and answered on behalf of their 57 centers. A single page questionnaire was used, seeking information on the logistics and clinical details of past and present RAPRT clinics, and reasons why other centers do not have one. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 100%. There are only 3 current RAPRT clinics (2.7%). The dominant treatment indication is bone metastases (85%-90%), with most patients receiving single fractions (60%-90%), but commencement on the same day is variable (35%-90%). Five other clinics (4.5%) closed after 4 months to 7 years, but the clinical features were similar. By far, the most common reason (95%) given by the 107 centers without a current RAPRT clinic was that these patients are accommodated using existing resources. CONCLUSIONS: Classical RAPRT clinics have not been widely embraced in ANZ. There are alternative strategies such as the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist model and techniques to avoid the conventional computed tomography-simulation step, which may also expedite treatment for palliative patients.